Irish Sources of Edward Lear's Early Picture Stories

In a previous post I quoted a passage from Prothero’s biography of Arthur Penrhyn Stanley reporting the event that might have originated Edward Lear’s picture story “St. Kiven and the Gentle Kathleen,” an illustrated version of Tom Moore’s “By that lake, whose gloomy shore” (Irish Melodies, vol. 4, 1811). No certain date can be given for this set of illustrations, 1835-36 is a possibility if the events at Glendalough were the source, though Lear also produced illustrations for other poems from the Irish Melodies: “Go where glory waits thee” and “Rich and  rare were the gems she wore,” both from volume 1 (1807), as well as “Eveleen’s Bower” from volume 2 (also 1807).

Lear’s interest in Ireland and its traditions was certainly stimulated by his strict connection with the Stanley family, who had large possessions in the island; it was probably during one of his frequent stays at Knowsley between 1832 and 1837 that he produced sets of illustrations, first published in Lear in the Original, for two traditional Irish stories, “The Adventures of Daniel O’Rourke” and “The Adventures of Mick,” from “Daniel O’Rourke” and “Legend of Bottle Hill,” two short stories published in Fairy Legends and Traditions of the South of Ireland (London: John Murray, 1834 — but there are editions as early as 1825 — pp. 134ff. and 33ff. respectively).

These pictures, together with the Moore adaptations (excluding St. Kiven) were part of an album Lear probably produced for some member of the Hornby family, whom Lear met at Knowsley.

I have recently identified the source for another set of Lear illustrations, first published by Vivien Noakes in The Complete Nonsense and Other Verse (London: Penguin, 2001,  pp. 40-2): “I slept, and back to my early days.” The original appeared, under the title “A Dream,” in The Dublin University Magazine: A Literary and Political Journal. (Volume I, Issue 2. February 1833, p. 145):

I slept — and back to my early days
Did wandering fancy roam,
When my hopes were bright, and my heart was light,
And my own a happy home.

And I dream’d I was young and innocent,
And my brow untrac’d by care,
While my parents smil’d on their darling child,
And breath’d for his weal a prayer.

Once again I was rising before the sun,
For in childhood I was told,
If its earliest ray on my head should play,
It would turn each tress to gold.

I was kneeling again on the grassy knoll,
Where I never may kneel more,
And I pray’d and was blest with that holier rest,
Whose halcyon reign is o’er.

I was sporting again through the fields and flowers,
And felt at each step new joys; —
But I woke with a sigh that e’er memory
Should revive what time destroys.

Lear provided five illustrations and copied four of the five stanzas (leaving out the last but one) and seems to have written down the text from memory as there are several, though small, variants. Unlike Lewis Carroll, Lear very seldom, if ever, parodied poems, and in this case too he provides a simple paraphrase for passages he probably could not remember; the comic effect is obtained in part by introducing a conventionally low speech register (“vos” for “was” and so on), but mostly through the pictures which, as often happens in nonsense, are literal representations of worn metaphors:

I slept, and back to my early days
Did wandering fancy roam —
When my heart vos light and my opes vos bright
And my own a appy ome.

When I dreamed I was young and hinnocent —
And my art vos free from care,
And my Parents smiled on their darling child,
And breathed for his [ ] a prayer.

Once again I was rising before the sun,
For in childhood I was told —
If its earliest ray on my head should play —
It would turn each tress to gold.

Once again I vos roaming through fileds and flowers,
And I felt at each step new joys —
But I woke with a sigh that memory
Should revive what time destroys.

When I first found the anonymously-published poem I felt sure it was by James Clarence Mangan, but it does not appear in the 4-volume collected works recently published, and David James O’Donoghue (The Life and Writings of James Clarence Mangan. Edinburgh: Patrick Geddes & Colleagues, 1897: 77) states that Mangan started contributing to the magazine early in 1834, i.e. a full year after this poem appeared. This date is confirmed by Wayne E. Hall: “In January 1834, James Clarence Mangan published translations from the German verse of Schiller, beginning a relationship with the DUM that would see far more of Mangan’s translating” (Dialogues in the Margin. A Study of the Dublin University Magazine. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1999, p. 42).

The fact in any case confirms that Lear, at least in the periods when he was staying at Knowsley, had access to Irish magazines and might have got to know some of Mangan’s poems, a fact which would throw a new light on his later Nonsense songs, whose similarities with the Irish poet’s more absurd compositions have been first noted by O’Donoghue himself:

He [Mangan] could write admirable nonsense when he liked, and the late Edward Lear might have got a hint or two from him for those “Nonsense” books which are held not undeservedly in such high estimation by present-day critics (p. 32).

It is perhaps worth noting that Mangan did write, or translate from the German of Justinus Kerner’s “Täuschung,” a poem which is remarkably similar to the one illustrated by Lear. It was entitled “Dreams” and was published in The Dublin University Magazine (Volume VIII, Issue 44, August 1836, pp. 153-4; also in The Collected Works of James Clarence Mangan. Poems: 1818-1837. Edited by Jacques Chuto et al. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1996, pp. 243-4):

I slumbered in the moonless midnight hour;
And in my dream I lay,
Methought, reclining in a sunlit bower,
Circled with flowrets gay.

Awaking, I looked forth. I saw the trees
Reft of their leafy worth;
I heard the hissing of the rains, as these
Pelted the naked earth.

Again I slumbered. In a lovely land,
Breathing soft Summer airs,
I stood. Warm friends about me pressed my hand,
And I pressed theirs.

Awaking, I beheld the assassin near,
Armed with the deadly knife.
Was it the phantom of a sudden fear
No! ’twas a shape of Life.

Oh! might I bid thee now farewell for aye,
Illusive scene of pain!
My world is all within — without alway
I seek for it in vain!

——

Such was, crewhile, the dreary song I sang,
When but betrayed by one;
Soon two proved false, and with a double pang
I dragged Existence on.

But ah! the broken vows I since bewail
No lay, though long, could sing;
The wearied fingers in their task would fail
Upon the mournful string.

More here.

Posted in Comics, Edward Lear | 8 Comments

Non-Limericks 2: Alfred Crowquill

Like Thackeray, Alfred Crowquill (pseudonym for Alfred Henry Forrester) has his place in the prehistory of comics thanks to an 1849 booklet entitled A Goodnatured Hint about California, a satire of the California gold rush. Besides publishing a successful series of illustrated fairy tales, Crowquill collaborated with several magazines of the time, Punch among them.

One of his special interests was the pantomime, a shown by another proto-comic he published in 1849, Pantomime, to be Played as it Was, Is, and Will Be, at Home (also available in at Coconino World). For some years, he produced “designs, devices and effects” for pantomimes, and he drew a number of “pantomimic extravaganzas” for the magazines. Among these, “The Christmas Pantomimes,” for The Illustrated London News of 31 December 1842 (pp. 536-37) is available from the Victorian Web under the title Alfred Crowquill’s Limericks for Eight London Pantomimes. Useless to say, the eight poems have nothing at all to do with the limerick, they consist of short poems in couplets, each with its own caricature illustration:

Crowquill Pantomimes

While dictionaries normally define it as “rhymed nonsense poem consisting of five lines,” it is clear that the word “limerick” is losing its specificity and for many people does no longer refer to the five-line nonsense poem popularized by Edward Lear; I would suggest that its current meanings are two:

  1. For most people, a short humorous poem with sexual innuendo;
  2. For scholars, a short 19th-century humorous poem accompanied by a caricatural drawing.

Nothing remains of the original nonsense connotation, except the humour, though it must be admitted that defining “nonsense” is not easy, and the “five” has become a generic “short.”

Posted in Comics, Edward Lear, Limerick | 2 Comments

Full Owl and Pussy-Cat from The Beano

On the Beano site you can now read the full comic-book adaptation of Edward Lear’s “The Owl and the Pussy-Cat” by Hunt Emerson. The last page includes a short biography of the poet.

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Non-Limericks 1: W.M. Thackeray

In his recent book on the Father of the Comic Strip: Rodolphe Töpffer (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2007), David Kunzle also discusses British parallels to the Genevan inventor of comics; among them a special section is devoted to William Makepeace Thackeray, in which Kunzle states that the Picture Magazine (vol. III, 1894) published one of Thackeray’s picture stories along with “some five illustrated limericks headed ‘Simple Melodies‘. The date 1832 on this sheet… puts Thackeray’s illustrated limericks well ahead of those famous avatars of nonsense verse printed by Lear in his first Book of Nonsense.” (p. 167).

Simple Melodies title page

A quick look at the small images reproduced in an article by Thierry Smolderen on Coconino World’s Village des Auteurs (“Thackeray and Töpffer. The Weimar Connection”) convinced me that the Simple Melodies were not really limericks, though they looked a lot like them. Thanks to Google Books I have now found that the poems (six of them against the four shown in Smolderen’s article) were also republished as illustrations to the second part of an essay by Lewis Melville on “Thackeray as Artist” in The Conoisseur. An Illustrated Magazine for Collectors. Vol. VIII (January-April 1904), pp. 25-31, 152-5. Melville, by the way, is more precise than Kunzle and defines the compositions “nursery rhymes”.

Simple Melodies: Ned Torre

While they are clearly not limericks, they consist of six lines with three different rhymes, they have a lot in common with Lear’s ones and were probably devised on the basis of the early limerick books of the 1820s:

  1. Each short poem is accompanied by a single picture;
  2. Each poem is about one character and describes his/her idiosyncratic behaviour, sometimes the characters are two, and then their relationship is the focus;
  3. The fun is generated by the juxtaposition of image and text.

Simple Melodies: Dicky Snooks

That Thackeray was also inpired by that archetype limerick of the “Sick Man of Tobago” (from Anecdotes and Adventures of Fifteen Gentlemen. London: John Marshall, [1821]) is, I think, amply demonstrated by two of the six Melodies:

I humble to write
The fate of Tom Knight
For here the poor fellow’s in bed seen
And see how he takes
Instead of beef steaks
All sorts of the nastiest med’cine.

Simple Melodies: Mary Knight

Miss Mary Knight
Has a small appetite
But Thomas her brother’s a glutton
For breakfast he takes
Two pounds of beefsteaks
And for dinner a leg of roast Mutton.

Further characteristics connecting Thackeray’s poems to Lear’s limericks are the interest in food shown in the examples above, as well as the informal, childish drawing style, in part no doubt due to the fact that Thackeray’s poems were not published, which is very different from the formal engravings typical of contemporary books and magazines. Thackeray himself liked to say that “he was not half so bad as the woodcutters made him appear” (Melville in The Conoisseur, p. 155), while Lear chose to use lithography as a means of maintaining his simple style.

Some of the Melodies also seem to follow the cautionary-tale tradition; in addition to “Good Dicky Snooks” above, which recommends study, the two remaining poems, like “Miss Mary Knight” above, celebrate moderation in eating:

Simple Melodies: Suky Jones

Dear Suky Jones
Though all skin & bones
Has a slim & an elegant figure
But Miss Mary Grig
Is as fat as a pig
And each day she grows bigger & bigger.

Simple Melodies: Miss Perkins

Little Miss Perkins
Much loved pickled Gerkins
And went to the Cup board & stole some
But they gave her such pain
She ne’er ate them again
She found them so shocking unwholesome.

Bob Turvey, in the July 2008 issue of The Pentatette (“William Makepeace Thackeray: Writer of Limericks Pre-Lear?”, p. 6), criticizes Kunzle’s definition of Thackeray’s poems as limericks and he is certainly right; however, I can’t see much difference between the Simple Melodies and many other examples usually accepted as belonging to the prehistory of the form (see my “The Limerick”, originally publishedin three parts in The Pentatette, November 1996- January 1997, for examples). Thackeray’s “nursery rhymes” should in my opinion be considered idiosyncratic variants based on the limerick books which had been published in the first half of the previous decade.

The Pentatette of September 1995, p. 4, reports that Thackeray did write limericks:

According to The Compleat Flea by Brendan Lehane (Viking Press, 1969), W.M. Thackeray’s “Wealthy Old Man of Tabreez” was one of several drawings-with-limericks sketched by Thackeray and friends of his, perhaps to amuse themselves one evening,

There’s a wealthy old man of Tabreez
With a maudlin affection for fleas.
He’ll grin with delight
When they scratch him and bite —
Perverted old man of Tabreez.

Did you know that here at nonsenselit.org you can read all the known 1820s limerick books?

Posted in Comics, Edward Lear, Limerick | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Explorigator

The Explorigator

Rush to Barnacle Press to enjoy the full run of The Explorigator, one of the most original, and nonsensical, comics of all times and meet a crew on a par with the one that set out to hunt the Snark.

Posted in Comics, Lewis Carroll | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Edward Lear in The Beano

Lew Stringer posts on Hunt Emerson’s comic strip adaptation of Edward Lear’s “The Owl and the Pussy-Cat.”

If anyone has scans of the complete three-page story I would be interested in getting them (I can’t find The Beano here in Italy.)

Posted in Edward Lear | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Shadows

After the success of his two Topsy-Turvys, Peter Newell published A Shadow Book (New York: The Century Co., 1896) in which after looking at a picture, e.g. of an Arab leading a camel,

you turn the page and place it in front of a light source, so that the image you now see represents something else, this case “A Rag Picker:”

Unfortunately, the images above were taken with a camera and do no justice to the real book: in many cases the different densities of the tints in the “front” picture produce nuances in the shadow one which enhance the effect. If I ever manage to find a way to get good images without ruining my copy, I’ll post the whole series.

It is likely that the book sold as well as the earlier ones, though it is harder to find as in many cases it was probably burnt by inattentive children who followed Newell’s back-cover suggestion of using a candle:

Better luck probably had those who preferred, or could afford, to use a light bulb, as recommended in the title page:

Shadow pictures, Kage-e, seem to have been common in woodblock prints of the Edo period in Japan, according to the pinktentacle blog. Here is one of the several instances posted:

In this case, first you looked at the shadow image cast on a door (in the example a hawk), and then discovered the real subject, a man in a very peculiar attitude.

1896 must have been the annus mirabilis of shadow books for the Century Co.: they also published Gobolinks, or Shadow-Pictures for Young and Old by Ruth McEnery Stuart and Albert Bigelow Paine. These were not real shadow pictures, but rather images obtained with a process involving, at least in part, chance:

Drop a little ink on a sheet of white paper. Fold the sheet in the center and press the ink-spots together with the fingers. All of the pictures in this book were made in this manner — none of them having been touched with a pen or brush.

To each of the images thus generated a short poem is added, in some cases a limerick:

On Peter Newell, also see Philip Hofer, “Peter Newell’s Pictures & Rhymes.” The Colophon. A Book Collectors’ Quarterly. Part Nineteen. New York, 1934.

Posted in Comics, Limerick, Peter Newell | Leave a comment

War Games and More Peter Newell Patents

If you enjoyed my previous posts on Peter Newell’s toy and toy-book patents, you cannot miss these on War Games from the Boer War and War Games from World War II from Steve van Dulken’s Patent Blog at the British Library.

Here, by the way, is another “Educational Toy” patented by Newell in 1921:

Peter Newell's Educational Toy

This invention relates to educational toys intende more especially for children; and the object of my invention is to provide a simple, convenient, attractive and instructive device whereby a succession of figures or pictures representing animals or objects of various kinds can be individually presented to view, together with the letters in sequence of the name of each animal or object thus presented in picture form…

This one, filed under the unlikely title of Vlamoakaph Co, includes the Jungle Jangle patent I already posted as well as one for The Hole Book (with scenes that were not used for the book),

Peter Newell's Hole Book Patent

and applications of the same principle “to commercial as distinguished from literary productions.”

Commercial Application Patent

Posted in Peter Newell | Leave a comment

The Pig-Faced Woman and the Limerick

In the early months of 1815 London was swept by reports of a pig-faced lady living in Manchester Square:

In the earlier part of this century, there was a kind of publication in vogue, somewhat resembling the more ancient broadside, but better printed, and adorned with a rather pretentious coloured engraving. One of those, published by Fairburn in 1815, and sold for a shilling, gives a portrait of the pig-faced lady, her silver trough placed on a table beside her. In the accompanying letter-press, we ore informed that she was then twenty years of age, lived in Manchester Square, had been born in Ireland, of a high and wealthy family, and on her life and issue by marriage a very large property depended. ‘This prodigy of nature,’ says the author, ‘is the general topic of conversation in the metropolis. In almost every company you join, the pig-faced lady is introduced, and her existence is firmly believed in by thousands, particularly those in the west end of the town. Her person is most delicately formed, and of the greatest symmetry; her hands and arms are delicately modelled in the happiest mould of nature; and the carriage of her body indicative of superior birth. Her manners are, in general, simple and unoffending; but when she is in want of food, she articulates, certainly, something like the sound of pigs when eating, and which, to those who are not acquainted with her, may perhaps be a little disagreeable.’ (The Book of Days: A Miscellany of Popular Antiquities. Edited by R. Chambers. London and Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers, 1832, v. 2, p. 256.)

Captain Gronow in his Recollections and Anecdotes (1863. London: John C. Nimmo, 1900, v.1, pp. 255-7) tells a different story:

Among the many absurd reports, and ridiculous stories current, in former days, I know of none more absurd, or more ridiculous, than the general belief of everybody in London, during the winter of 1814, in the existence of a lady with a pig’s face. This interesting specimen of porcine physiognomy was said to be the daughter of a great lady residing in Grosvenor Square.

It was rumoured that during the illuminations which took place to celebrate the Peace, when a great crowd had assembled in Piccadilly and St. James’s Street, and when carriages could not move on very rapidly, “horresco referens!” an enormous pig’s snout had been seen protruding from a fashionable-looking bonnet in one of the landaus which were passing. The mob cried out, “The pig-faced lady! the pig-faced lady! Stop the Carriage stop the Carriage!” The coachman, wishing to save his bacon, whipped his horses, and drove through the crowd at a tremendous pace; but it was said that the coach had been seen to set down its monstrous load in Grosvenor Square.

John Ashton, in Social England under the Regency (London: Chatto & Windus, 1899, pp. 219-22) adds a few details and also has a print, “Waltzing a Courtship” (1815), showing the supposed pig-faced woman dancing with a “short deformed man,” a caricature of Lord Kirkcudbright (as described under the title “Waltzing in Courtship” as no. 12630 in George. Catalogue of Prints and Drawings in the British Museum. Division I. Political and Personal Satires. v. 9, p. 602).

Waltzing a Courtship

The pose of the two dancers — and in particular their feet, as well as the man’s right arm — is the same Edward Lear would use thirty years later for his dancing characters, e.g.

The mingling of human and animal features, though never by simply juxaposing incongruous body parts as here, is also typically learian:

One of Lear’s limerick illustrations even includes a pig-faced woman, though she is not the protagonist:

On 15 March 1815 another print appeared which might provide further, more interesting clues on the rise of the limerick book in the early 1820s. This one was by George Cruikshank and put together two deformed figures, the hog-faced lady and the “spanish Mule of Madrid,” a reference to Ferdinand VII, king of Spain (see George, Catalogue of Prints and Drawings in the British Museum. Division I. Political and Personal Satires. v. 9, pp. 513-4, no. 12508, for an explanation):


© Trustees of the British Museum

What makes this print interesting for the history of the limerick is the fact that it contains all the elements of the early, and of Lear’s, collections except the metrical form itself: each picture presents a single peculiar character identified by geographical location, and the whole forms a gallery of lunatics, whose “story” is told in the captions below.

Studies of the origins of the limerick have mostly focused on the rise of the five-line poem, but — given the preponderance of illustration over text in all the early collections and, again, in Lear — it is perhaps time to look in other directions, and none appears more promising than the huge output of satirical prints in the early decades of the 19th century.

(For a full account of the myth of the pig-faced woman, which goes back to the beginnings of the 17th century, see Jan Bondeson, The Two-Headed Boy, and Other London Medical Marvels. Ithaka: Cornell University Press, 2000, pp. 95-119.)

Posted in Edward Lear, Limerick | 1 Comment

A Photographer's Day Out… with Edward Lear

Nancy Hill, a photographer and writer as well as old time fan of Edward Lear’s nonsense, has a new site showcasing her photographic work. Of particular interest are two portfolios: Fools and Limericks.

Posted in Edward Lear, General | Leave a comment